Supreme Court seeks report from Jharkhand on judge killing | India News – Times of India

NEW DELHI: Concerned over the growing contagion on judges and lawyers, a Supreme Court on Friday directed Additional District Judge Uttam Anand to take a self-motivated view of the alleged murder and submit the status of investigation to the Jharkhand Chief Secretary and DGP. In a week.
Although on Thursday, CJI NV Ramana spoke to Jharkhand High Court Chief Justice Ravi Ranjan, which led the High Court to investigate the incident, on Friday a bench of CJI and Justice Surya Kant decided to take up the Jharkhand case without PAN, based on India, judges and lawyers across the country. News of the attack was received.
The bench said that the safety and security of judicial officers and lawyers is crucial for the fearless and independent conduct of the administration of justice. On Thursday, SC Bar Association president Bikash Singh mentioned the Dhanbad incident before the CJI and demanded a CBI probe, calling it a “ruthless attack” on the independence of the judiciary.
Returning to the Jharkhand incident, the bench said it was paying spontaneous attention to the proximity of the Ranchi-based lawyer to the “unfortunate death of an additional district judge” who was shot dead by miscreants on July 2. However, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the self-motivated Dhanbad of the incident adopted by it will not impede the proceedings of the Jharkhand High Court regarding the death of the Additional District Judge.
The Supreme Court called the Dhanbad incident “horrific” and said the video clip promoted “it is not a normal road accident”.
The bench said in its order, “We direct the Chief Secretary of the State of Jharkhand and the Director General of Police to jointly submit with the registry a status report of the investigation into the tragic death of judicial officer Uttam Anand. Within a week this cart.”
The CJI-led bench said that the SC was motivated by mot motions “in other parts of the country where attacks on judicial officers and lawyers have taken place”. Given the responsibilities and obligations of the state to create an environment and provide full protection to the judicial authorities as well as the legal fraternity so that they can perform their duties without fear, we consider it appropriate to motivate this issue automatically.
“Since there is an urgent need for extensive consideration and subsequent detailed explanation (s) by all concerned, we will consider issuing notices to all other States and Union Territories at the next hearing date.”
The bench asked the Jharkhand Chief Secretary and the DGP to elaborate on the steps taken to protect judicial officers, judges and the legal fraternity inside and outside the court complex.
A quick search of news reports of attacks on judges by the TOI has revealed many such incidents in the recent past.
In Uttar Pradesh, on March 25, Unnao Additional District Judge Prahlad Tandon was upset with his decision and was assaulted by a group of lawyers. Thus humiliated, the judicial officer resigned. The State Bar Council has identified eight lawyers involved in the attack.
In February, a man threw motor oil into the official car of Kerala High Court Justice V Shirsi, blackening the driver’s side of the car. In July last year, Chittor Magistrate V Ramakrishna alleged that he was assaulted by the ruling YSRCP cadres, who were assistants to Andhra Pradesh Minister P Ramachandra Reddy. Ramakrishna alleged that he was insulted due to a disagreement with former Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy, chairperson of the AP Electricity Regulatory Commission. In Maharashtra in Maharashtra in 2011 Maharashtra Senior Civil Judge KR Deshpande was slapped by an Assistant Public Prosecutor who was outraged by his decision in a case.
In 1994, in light of the growing frequency of attacks on the independence of judges, lawyers and court officials, the weak protection of the judiciary and lawyers and the concentration of human rights violations, the UN Human Rights Commission decided to appoint a special reporter for judges and lawyers. Special Correspondents continue to report adversely on the safety and security of judges and lawyers.
In July of last year, Daniel Enderl, son of U.S. District Judge Easter Salas, and her husband, Defense Attorney Mark Enderl, were shot at their New Jersey home in North Brunswick Township. The tragedy forced New Jersey to enact a Daniel Act in the name of Salas’s son in November last year, which criminalizes disclosing the personal phones, phone numbers and home addresses of New Jersey judges, prosecutors and law enforcement officials.

.

Read More World News

Keep Reading Latest Breaking News

Source link

Advertisement

Leave a Comment