The apex court said the relevant committee of the board would examine the reasons for rejecting or accepting the arguments raised by the students and the reasons for the record in order to question the allocation or rationality of the marks given to them.
You have successfully cast your vote
A bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar and City Rabikumar said, “We have directed the concerned committee to re-examine the grievances of the petitioners and record the reasons for rejecting or accepting the grievances raised by the petitioners for questioning the appropriateness / rationality of the number given to the petitioners.” . The apex court passed the order while hearing a petition filed by some 12th class pass-out students claiming that their numbers were not counted on the basis of their actual performance, according to the Central Board of Secondary Education’s 30:30:40 source. (CBSE).
The petitioners further complained that the board has failed to properly implement the dispute resolution procedure related to the results.
The bench said that the petition filed earlier would be considered as representation and the grounds raised in it would be dealt with properly by the committee within two weeks.
The apex court has listed the matter for hearing two weeks later.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners stated that the matter raises the issue of alleged non-implementation of the assessment policy in true letter and spirit.
The lawyer said the authorities decided to represent them but without a speaking order and they did not go into the issues raised by the students.
The prosecutor argued that these students differed in numbers based on their actual performance and the numbers given in the results.
“Their complaint is that they were not marked in accordance with the assessment policy confirmed by the court,” the prosecutor argued, adding that the applicants were not challenging the assessment policy in any way.
The lawyer appearing for CBSE told the bench that the school was duly informed that the results were declared as per the policy of the board.
The bench then asked whether the concerned authorities had given reasons while dealing with a separate complaint raised by the student.
The CBSE had earlier told the apex court that it had “properly followed the assessment scheme” in assessing the number of 12th class students whose exams were canceled due to the Kovid-19 epidemic.
On June 17, the apex court approved the assessment projects of the School Certificate Examination Council of India (CISCE) and CBSE, which adopted the 30:30:40 formula for assessing numbers for Class XII students based on the results. Classes 10, 11, and 12, respectively.
The apex court had approved the assessment schemes of CISCE and CBSE and said that dispute resolution provisions should be included if students want to amend the final results.
The petition, which was heard by the Supreme Court on Thursday, claimed that the petitioners were given less marks, which led to widespread prejudice against them.
The petition alleges that CBSE provided the process for resolving the dispute but “failed to implement it only on paper and in practice which has created widespread prejudice for the applicant students and if it is unresolved it will cause them irreparable loss”.
30:30:40 Instructions are also sought to declare their results on the basis of formulas and considering the actual numbers obtained by them.
The CBSE had earlier said that it would evaluate 12th class students for theory on the basis of 30 per cent marks in 10th board, 30 per cent from 11th class and 40 per cent marks in unit, mid-term and unit performance. Pre-board exams in 12 classes.
It said that the scores obtained by the students of class 12 in practical and internal assessment on a practical basis uploaded by the schools on the CBSE portal would also be considered in deciding the final result.
Read More Educational News
Keep Reading Latest Breaking News