noc: Plea against NOC to Metro rail project in Juhu Airport vicinity: Bombay HC seeks report on public safety | India News – Times of India

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday sought an independent comprehensive report from Central Civil Aviation Secretary Rajiv Bansal on the height clearance granted for an over-ground metro rail project in Mumbai.
The High Court bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Dutt and Ms Karnik said, “Bansal will also consider the safety and security of the public, who live in the vicinity of Juhu Airport and will look into whether a metro rail line is being launched. MMRDA (Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development It will affect the flight operations at the airport. ”
A public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the NOC for the Metro 2B line has been adjourned till February 28. The High Court has allowed and clarified the MMRDA to continue the preparatory work for the Metro rail line till further orders till further orders. “Except for such preparatory work, no other work can be done on the site without the prior permission of this court.”
The PIL was filed in the High Court by Harit Desai, who had earlier challenged the MMRDA’s No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued by the Airports Authority of India (AAI) for the construction of an over-ground metro rail line in the funnel zone. Approach and take off climb surface of Runway 26 and 08 at Juhu Airport, respectively. Desai’s counsel Nishantha Thakkar submitted that it was contrary to the rules of NOCT Ministry (Altitude Restriction for Protection of Air Operations) Rules, 2015. PIL has expressed fears of an accident if the MMRDA’s metro line is launched.
The rail corridor runs from DN Nagar, Andheri (west) to Mankhurd.
The court, after hearing AAI counsel, Sandeep Marne and state advocate general Ashutosh Kumbakoni, wanted to know whether the NOC complied with the rules.
Observing that since it does not have the capability to test the technicalities involved, “but at the same time concerns have been raised … this PIL seems to be serious”, the High Court sought the assistance of an expert in civil aviation.
“Accordingly, we propose that the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) may be requested to examine the concerns raised by the applicant in light of his alleged violation of the provisions of the 2015 rules by the AAI and his risk of accidental termination of MMRDA’s Metro rail line.” . ”
However, prosecutor Thakkar pointed out to the court that Arun Kumar, the current DGCA, the current Joint Secretary (Airport) at the relevant time, was the Ministry of Civil Aviation and he was involved in the decision making. The process by which unwanted NOCs are issued. He thus requested for the replacement of the DGCA by the Secretary of Civil Aviation, which was accepted by the High Court after Kumbakoni and Marne did not object.
The High Court directed that Thackeray and central government lawyer DP Singh would bring his order to the notice of the Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation.

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’, ‘’); fbq(‘init’, ‘593671331875494’); fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’); .

Read More World News

Keep Reading Latest Breaking News

Source link

Leave a Comment