malik: Won’t comment on Sameer Wankhede, family till December 9: Nawab Malik assures Bombay HC | India News – Times of India

New Delhi: Maharashtra Minister and NCP leader Nawab Malik on Thursday assured the Bombay High Court that he would not post any tweets or make public comments against NCB zonal director Sameer Wankhede, his father or their family members till December 9. Date of hearing
The statement came after the high court asked the minister whether he had lodged a complaint with the caste verification committee against his allegations against Sameer Wankhede’s caste certificate.
The court also said that if he did not do so, what was his motive behind the “media propaganda”, which it said was not appropriate for a minister.
The statement was made on behalf of Malik by his lawyer Carl Tumbley before a bench of Justices SJ Kathawalla and Milind Yadav, who later said he was interested in passing an order barring the minister from making public remarks against Wankhede until the next hearing.
The bench said it was clear that the owner’s tweets stemmed from animosity.
“We want to know why the minister is behaving in such a manner. It is nothing but hatred. Please read the dictionary of hatred,” the High Court said.
The bench was hearing an appeal filed by Sameer Wankhed’s father Gyandev Wankhed challenging the order of a single bench of the High Court on November 22 to restrain him from making defamatory statements against the owner and his family.
Senior counsel Birendra Saraf, appearing for Gyandev before a bench headed by Justice Kathwalla, submitted that the single bench had recorded in its order that the owner had lodged a complaint against Sameer Wankher regarding his religion and he had been illegally satisfied. Duties, without proper verification.
“Single bench inquiries revealed that the tweets (from the owner) acted out of hatred and animosity and yet, I (Jnandev) were not given any relief,” said Saraf.
“The single judge said he (the owner) ignored the truth, and the documents he submitted to the court were either interpolated or not verified,” he said.
Saraf further said that the minister had made remarks not only against Gyandev and Sameer Wankhede, but also against other members of their family.
“He (the owner) did not spare anyone … my daughter, my dead wife. This morning, too, he tweeted,” Saraf said, referring to a tweet from the minister on Thursday morning, where he posted a picture. The document he says relates to the last rites of Gyanadeva’s wife and shows his religion as Muslim.
Saraf added that the owner had submitted the documents to the court without any scrutiny.
Tamboli, however, said that the NCP leader had submitted verified documents before a single bench in an affidavit to substantiate multiple allegations against Wangkhed, claiming that Samir was born in Wangkhed but falsely claimed in his caste certificate to secure his central government job. Category nominated.
The bench asked whether the owner had lodged any formal complaint before the caste verification committee.
When Tamboli said no such allegations had been made, the bench asked why the owner was making such a public statement.
“Has there been any complaint to the Caste Verification Committee? If not, what is he trying to prove? Is it for media coverage? For the claim of caste lies, everyone has a remedy forum (Caste Verification Committee),” the High Court said.
“If he (the owner) has a caste certificate, why not go to the committee instead of all the media propaganda he wants every day, especially after his son-in-law was arrested in Wankhede? … he is a minister … ? ” Ask the bench.
The court further said that if it became clear that the owner’s tweets acted out of malice and that it was recorded as a clear inquiry by a single bench, then what should be reasonably followed is that the minister should refrain from making further comments until he is enlightened. Wankhede’s appeal was finally heard in court.
Tambli then wanted time to take instructions.
He said the owner’s daughter-in-law was present in court and they decided that “instead of arguing, I (the owner) would not tweet or say anything until the final hearing”.
The High Court accepted Tambli’s statement, but asked why the minister’s daughter-in-law was present in the courtroom when she was not a party to the case.
The whole family of the minister is involved with this? Why is he here? Asked the High Court.
However, Tamboli’s statement on record states that “no tweets or public statements can be made until the next date of the hearing, December 9, through any means of propaganda, directly or indirectly, against the defendant (Gyandev Wankhede) and his family members.” .
(With input from PTI)


Read More World News

Keep Reading Latest Breaking News

Source link


Leave a Comment