Kolkata High Court directs CBI probe into Bengal school recruitment irregularities – Times of India

Kolkata: The Kolkata High Court on Monday directed the CBI to probe allegations of recruitment of Group D staff in aided / sponsored schools under the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education (WBBSE) under the State School Service Commission (WBBSE). SSC) and to find out if any money trail was involved.

The order was made in a petition filed by some job seekers, claiming that the appointments were made after the expiry of the proposed panel for Group D staff in state-aided / sponsored secondary and higher secondary schools.

Advertisement

Justice Abhijit Ganguly directed the director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to form a committee headed by a joint director rank officer with officers not below the rank of DIG to initiate an investigation.

Congratulations!

You have successfully cast your vote

The court said it hoped no one would be excluded from the investigation.

Justice Gangopadhyay directed the CBI to “investigate a very important part of this serious irregularity and irregularity as to whether there is any financial means in issuing such letters of recommendation and subsequent issuance of appointment letters to individuals”.

Advertisement

The court directed the CBI to file a preliminary report on December 21, when the next order in the matter would be issued.

The matter will come up for hearing again on December 24, the court said.

The judge said, “I notice that the perpetrators, of course, have some people behind this whole corruption, whatever their position in society or politics, they cannot really be political figures – they can take refuge under different political parties.”

Advertisement

The court also directed the CBI to look into the alleged irregularities in the appointment from that angle.

“Corruption is rampant in the entire process of government employment, which needs to be tackled with determination,” it observed.

The petitioners first submitted to the court a list of 25 recruits, but later claimed that more than 500 such recruits had been made.

Advertisement

The WBBSE claimed that all the appointments were made on the recommendation of the SSC. But the commission submitted an affidavit before the court stating that after May 4, 2019, when the panel of Group D workers expired, no recommendation was issued by it.

“Without showing any disrespect to the police force of the state, I have given the order to the CBI only because both the authorities, the commission and the board, as well as the police authority are controlled by the state,” Justice Ganguly said in his order.

The court said that it was a matter of the Department of Education which is a state department and money should be spent from the public exchequer for the posts which are justified for building trust among the people in such matters. An investigation by a neutral agency.

Advertisement

Prosecutors have submitted that any retired judge of the High Court or more than one retired judge may be appointed to investigate the matter.

The commission’s lawyers also supported the proposal.

“However, after receiving the affidavit of the board today, I found that a CBI inquiry (not an investigation at this stage) is required to identify the culprits who issued some letters of recommendation and the board acted on it,” the court said.

The SSC had stated in its affidavit before the court that it had not issued any such recommendation to the WBBSE.

Advertisement

The court then directed the WBBSE to file an affidavit as to the source on the basis of which it had issued appointment letters to the 25 candidates.

Observing that the content of the WBBSE affidavit submitted on Monday was astonishing, the court said that it was entitled to the original recommendations issued by the SSC.

The WBBSE said it had received hard copies of the complete data and soft copies of the 25 candidates in question and all other recommendations made by the commission for Group-D posts between December, 2019 and February, 2020, and announced that they would apply if necessary. Can produce.

Advertisement

The court directed the petitioners to file a table list of 542 persons appearing before the court on November 24 with attachments or letters of appointment stating the names, dates and dates of the persons they claimed to have come to their procession. Their appointment letter.

Justice Gangopadhyay directed that a copy of the list and all other affidavits used in this regard should be handed over to the CBI counsel along with the writ petition.

The court ordered that the 542 people named on Monday be added as party defendants in the case.

Advertisement

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘2009952072561098’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
.

Source link

Read More Educational News

Keep Reading Latest Breaking News

Leave a Comment