HC agrees to hear plea to restrain ‘media trial’ of wrestler Sushil Kumar | More sports News – Times of India

New Delhi: A petition seeking rules to prevent the media from ‘sensationalizing’ the trial of wrestler and Olympic medalist Sushil Kumar in the case of death of a 23-year-old man and reporting rules for criminal cases was mentioned before Delhi on Thursday. was done. The High Court agreed to hear it on 28 May.
The petition was referred before a bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh, which allowed it to be listed for hearing on Friday.

A law student has filed a petition alleging that the reporting of the case against him by the media in connection with the controversy at the Chhatrasal Stadium has damaged Kumar’s career and reputation, leading to the death of the 23-year-old wrestler.
On May 23, a Delhi court remanded Kumar in 6 days of police custody for questioning in the murder of a fellow wrestler, saying that the charges against him are of a serious nature and no one is above the law. .
Kumar and his associates allegedly assaulted wrestler Sagar Dhankhar (23) and his two friends Sonu and Amit Kumar at the Chhatrasal Stadium here on the intervening night of May 4 and 5.
Kumar was arrested along with co-accused Ajay from Mundka in outer Delhi on 23 May. The two-time Olympic medalist was absconding for nearly three weeks.
Allowing the police to interrogate Kumar for six days, the magistrate had said, “No one is above the law and the law treats everyone equally. Our constitution is subject to exceptions to the right to life and liberty to all persons Guarantees. Charges against accused persons are grave in nature. ”
Delhi Police has filed FIRs under Sections 302 (murder), 308 (non-willful murder), 365 (kidnapping), 325 (causing serious injury), 323 (voluntarily injuring), 341 (wrongfully restraining) and 506 in the case. Is recorded. Criminal intimidation of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)).
FIRs were also registered under sections 188 (disobedience of order by public servant), 269 (likely to spread infection of the disease by negligence), 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 34 (common intention) of IPC and various sections of Arms Act. was. .

.

Read More Sports News

Keep Reading Latest Breaking News

Source link

Advertisement

Leave a Comment