Class 12 Exam: Properly Followed Assessment Scheme, CBSE to SC – Times of India

NEW DELHI: The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that it has “properly followed” the assessment scheme in assessing the marks of Class XII students whose exams have been canceled due to the Kovid-1 pandemic epidemic.

Counsel appearing for CBSE, Justice AM Khanvilkar and Justice Citi Ravikumar made the statement before a bench hearing a batch of petitions alleging that the board had failed to properly implement the dispute resolution process regarding Class XII examinations.


“We have followed the policy properly,” the lawyer representing the CBSE told the bench.


You have successfully cast your vote

On June 1, the apex court approved the assessment scheme of the Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE) and CBSE, which adopted the 30:30:40 formula for assessing marks for Class XII students based on the results. Classes 10, 11, and 12

During the hearing on Wednesday, the lawyer appearing for the petitioners, citing a chart in an application, claimed that the number was given by the CBSE after moderating with a 30:30:40 formula and the school’s average score.


“It’s an evaluation project. Isn’t it? School performance is also relevant,” the bench observed.

The bench asked the lawyer appearing for CBSE about the allegations raised by the petitioners.

CBSE’s lawyer, referring to the affidavit filed by the board in this regard, said the chart showing the difference in marks was made on the basis of “misreading” of the assessment policy.


He said the affidavit states that the chart cited by some applicants is based on a single component of the overall calculation of marks, where the assessment policy takes into account other relevant aspects, including historical and historical performance, school, overall school average and moderate criteria Has created a special software.

The lawyer said the board said in its affidavit that once all data is fed into the software, it automatically analyzes the performance of students in that particular year based on the policy.

Lawyers representing some of the applicants said their school had also lodged a complaint with the CBSE.


The petitioner’s lawyer said that he would file a review in the affidavit of CBSE, after which the bench gave him one week time for it.

On October 8, the Supreme Court asked the CBSE to respond to two separate petitions in this regard.

An application claimed that the board had failed to implement the process of settling the dispute, which was set out in a circular issued in August this year in compliance with the June 17 order of the Supreme Court.


On June 17, the apex court approved the assessment scheme of CISCE and CBSE and also said that if students want to amend the final result, the dispute resolution provision should be included.

One of the petitions filed by the 12th class pass-out students claimed that their numbers were not calculated on the basis of their actual performance by adopting the CBSE 30:30:40 formula.

It said the applicants were given low marks, which is creating widespread prejudice for them.


The petition alleges that CBSE provided the dispute resolution process but “failed to implement it only on paper and in practice which has created huge prejudice for the applicant students and if it is not resolved they will suffer irreparable loss”.

It said that the matter to be considered before the apex court is whether the concerned authority has the responsibility to decide the case raised through appropriate means of dispute resolution, after considering the bizarre facts and circumstances of the case, beyond the reasonable / speaking order.

It also sought instructions to declare their results based on the 30:30:40 formula and the actual numbers obtained by them.


The CBSE had earlier said it would evaluate 12th grade students for theory on the basis of marks from Class 10 to 30 per cent, Class 11 to 30 per cent and unit performance to 40 per cent marks, mid-term and Class 12 pre-board exams.

It said that the scores obtained by 12th class students in practical and internal assessments uploaded by schools on the CBSE portal would also be considered in determining the final results.

The Supreme Court, citing the June 1 assessment plan of both the boards, said that “there is no question of revoking the earlier decision on cancellation of the examination” as there would be no prejudice against the students as they could still attend the examination on time.


The court passed the order while hearing an application seeking directions to cancel the Class 12 examinations of CBSE and CISCE amid the epidemic situation.

s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
fbq(‘init’, ‘2009952072561098’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);

Source link

Read More Educational News

Keep Reading Latest Breaking News

Leave a Comment