CA exam: We are not here to control everything, SC says, refuses to accept application – Times of India

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an application by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) challenging a notification by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) regarding the CA exams scheduled for next month, saying “we are not here to control everything.”

A bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar and Citi Rabikumar questioned the petitioner as to why he had filed a miscellaneous petition (MA) in a writ petition which was earlier disposed of by the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Congratulations!

You have successfully cast your vote

“We reject this app entertainment. It will be open to the applicant to draw the attention of the appropriate authorities to make the necessary corrections, if and when necessary, “the bench said. , Test staff and mentions candidates’ guidelines for the CA exam in December 2021.

Advertisement

“How can you file an MA? This is a basic prayer. You are asking questions about some circulars,” the bench observed.

The counsel appearing for the petitioner said that it was a circular in continuation of the order passed by the Supreme Court on June 30.

On June 30, the apex court allowed candidates scheduled to participate in the July CA exam to opt-out if they or their family members were infected with Covid-19.

Advertisement

It passed the order in June during the hearing of a batch of appeals for various reliefs, including an opt-out option for candidates, postponement of examinations and increase in the number of centers this year.

During the hearing on Monday, the counsel appearing for the petitioner said that the examination is now scheduled to be held in December, following the directions of the Supreme Court.

“The situation in June 2021 was different, now the situation is different and it is an evolving situation,” the bench observed, adding, “We are not here to control everything.”

Advertisement

Prosecutors said there was no built-in scheme for re-election in the November 8 notification.

“You don’t have to worry. The authorities are more worried than you are,” the bench said.

The Supreme Court has said that if the petitioner is offended by any substantive decision taken by the appropriate authority, he can challenge it in an independent process.

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘2009952072561098’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
.

Source link

Read More Educational News

Keep Reading Latest Breaking News

Advertisement

Leave a Comment